EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL PDF

Addendum to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual: Scoring of the EORTC QLQ- CPAL. Mogens Groenvold and Morten Aagaard Petersen on behalf of the. PDF | On Apr 1, , Mogens Groenvold and others published EORTC QLQ- CPAL: The new standard in the assessment of health-related. This study aimed at developing a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30, one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires in.

Author: Felabar Shakalar
Country: Brunei Darussalam
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 17 March 2008
Pages: 273
PDF File Size: 12.32 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.58 Mb
ISBN: 179-9-67869-683-5
Downloads: 56643
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Batilar

Help us Corrections Found an error or omission? This module should be installed from within Stata qlq-c15-apl typing “ssc install qlqc15”. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

More about this item Keywords data management ; questionnaire scoring ; Statistics Access and download statistics Corrections All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. Niels Henrik Bruun Aarhus University.

QLQC Stata module for scoring of the EORTC QLQ-CPAL

Shorter quality-of-life QoL assessments are beneficial for palliative patients as they reduce burden associated with completing personal, and at times stressful, questionnaires. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about. When requesting a correction, please mention this item’s handle: N2 – This study aimed at developing a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30, one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires in oncology, for palliative care research.

If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the “citations” tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

  IVAR JACOBSON OOSE PDF

Both tools cover the core items relevant to patients with advanced cancers and can be supplemented with disease-specific tools. Although significant overlap exists between both tools, there is a marked difference in the aspects of QoL assessed. More about this item Keywords data management ; questionnaire scoring ; Statistics Access and download statistics.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Windows users should not attempt to download these files with a web browser. A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care”. If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item.

RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.

Corrections All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. Main research site Explore Bristol Research. European Journal of CancerVol. Depending on the qlqc15-pal questions, it may be supplemented by additional items, modules or questionnaires.

EORTC QLQ-CPAL | EORTC – Quality of Life : EORTC – Quality of Life

Important dimensions not covered by the questionnaire were identified. European Journal of Cancer42 155 – A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care ‘ European Journal of Cancervol. A comparison between both questionnaires in terms of development, characteristics, validation and use was conducted. You can help correct errors and omissions. We have no references for this item.

A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care Research output: Item response theory methods were used to shorten scales. General contact details of provider: The purpose of this article was to conduct a review of studies utilizing these two palliative-specific QoL instruments, their development and their relative strengths for use in advanced cancer patients.

  EL TAPIZ DE FIONAVAR PDF

Each instrument has unique strengths and weaknesses and choice between these tools is dependent on the investigator and study needs. Scoring, organization and item format are different; however, response options and recall period are the same.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Download full text from publisher File URL: Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services. If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. The study included interviews with 41 patients and 66 health care professionals in palliative care to determine the appropriateness, relevance and importance of the various domains of the QLQ-C Four scales were shortened without reducing measurement precision.

A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. You can help adding qlqq-c15-pal by using this form. This allows to link your profile to this item. Future studies should directly compare these two tools and validate their use through a number of administration modes.

Niels Henrik Bruun, European Journal of Cancer.